On TV.com: 2009's Most PIRATED TV Show
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

May 6th, 2009

Moonlight assumes subordinate position for Microsoft Silverlight

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn @ 7:28 am

Categories: Applications, Distributions, General, Internet, Microsoft, mass market

Tags: Microsoft Silverlight, Microsoft Corp., Moon, Open Source, Dana Blankenhorn

How should open source feel about the release of a new Microsoft Silverlight Linux port?

Really, really good, writes Miguel de Icaza, noting that a preview of Version 2.0 is now ready to roll.

It’s so good our Microsoft blogger, Mary Jo Foley, gushes over it over at ZDNet’s All About Microsoft. The Version 2.0 Moonlight will preview just months before Microsoft releases Version 3.0 of Silverlight, she writes.

Which is all you really need to know. This is not open source closing the gap on Microsoft. This is open source assuming the subordinate position.

It’s the kind of open source success story Microsoft wants publicized. Microsoft innovates, open source copies.

It’s not the kind of open source story open source needs, however.

What open source needs is real innovation, created by teams who may or may not represent Microsoft’s fierce competitors. This can be hard to deliver, and Microsoft would like us all to know resistance in this case is futile.

Even the name Moonlight assumes the subordinate position. The Moon has no light of its own. It merely reflects light from a nearby star. In this case, Microsoft.

But is it? Which consumer open source projects do you think are doing the most innovation right now?

Dana BlankenhornDana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for 30 years, a tech freelancer since 1983. You can follow Dana on Twitter. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Dana Blankenhorn

Subscribe to Linux and Open Source via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 24 Talkback(s)
RE: Moonlight assumes subordinate position for Microsoft Silverlight
Duplicate. (Read the rest)
Posted by: GregStarr Posted on: 06/15/09  (Edited: 06/17/09 @ 09:32) You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
REALLY????  Fark | 05/06/09
He put it very well!! Moonlight must follow Silverlight, and Microsoft  DonnieBoy | 05/06/09
Open source doesn't innovate  honeymonster | 05/06/09
MS doesn't innovate...  xXSpeedzXx | 05/06/09
So wrong!  Gladiatorcn | 05/06/09
Then I suppose posting this link ...  Confused by religion | 05/06/09
correction: QDOS was bought from Seattle Computer Products for $50K  Custard_over_2x_Pie | 05/06/09
Which was a rip of cp/m  Alan Smithie | 05/06/09
Yes!  Custard_over_2x_Pie | 05/06/09
Disagree  bmonster | 05/07/09
Wishful thinking.  kozmcrae | 05/06/09
Where innovation comes from  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 05/06/09
Open Source Does innovate a lot in a few cases  zelrikriando | 05/06/09
Ignorant generalization  maskman01 | 05/06/09
RE: Moonlight assumes subordinate position for Microsoft Silverlight  migueldeicaza | 05/06/09
Behind the link  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 05/06/09
Innovation and inventions  honeymonster | 05/06/09
RE: Moonlight assumes subordinate position for Microsoft Silverlight  migueldeicaza | 05/06/09
RE: Moonlight assumes subordinate position for Microsoft Silverlight  migueldeicaza | 05/06/09
"matter of market penetration and distribution."  kozmcrae | 05/06/09
RE: Moonlight assumes subordinate position for Microsoft Silverlight  Mike Chaliy | 05/06/09
RE: Moonlight assumes subordinate position for Microsoft Silverlight  AccesPublic | 05/06/09
RE: Moonlight assumes subordinate position for Microsoft Silverlight  GregStarr | 06/15/09
RE: Moonlight assumes subordinate position for Microsoft Silverlight  GregStarr | 06/15/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Click Here

Recent Entries

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here