On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

August 30th, 2005

Who is representing Mambo?

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn @ 10:14 am

Categories: Applications, Development, Distributions, General

Tags:

Mambo Foundation logoI took a call from Brussels, Belgium, this morning, from Ben Kwiecinski.

It was about Mambo, the open source CMS project. A dispute between Miro Software, which created the original code, and its development team, has resulted in Miro placing the code with a foundation it created and the developers walking away from it.  

Kwiecinski was pretty down on the Foundation. "This foundation hasn’t done anything right as far as I’m concerned," he said. As he talked it reminded me of what happened at a neighbor’s church, where the pastor wanted one thing and the deacons another. The pastor left, and parishioners had to choose. (Most went with the pastor.)

"All this was sprung on us a few weeks ago," said Kwiecinski. "This is not the way to do it. The foundation needs to come from within the community, and it must be a consultative process, or people feel alienated."

MamboI don’t know who’s right here. I do know that CMS software is mission critical to many businesses (maybe to most businesses), that Mambo has been downloaded 5 million times, and that those users are now caught east of the rock and west of the hard place. Should they follow the fork? Which side is the fork?

And what does this say to the open source community at large? If a great project like Mambo can be split like this, it makes it that much more difficult for a business to trust its future to open source, any open source.

My guess is users will choose, in time, based on performance. Kwiecinski makes it sound like a freely competitive situation. "We’ll have two people doing the same thing, with the same code, in the same way, just under another name." But a year from now, or two, people will have to choose, and either way they go, they’re going with an outfit that is smaller (when compared to proprietary competitors) than it would be otherwise.

Why not just call Oracle? 

Dana BlankenhornDana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for 30 years, a tech freelancer since 1983. You can follow Dana on Twitter. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Dana Blankenhorn

Subscribe to Linux and Open Source via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 9 Talkback(s)
Message has been deleted.
(Read the rest)
Posted by: myfevertoy Posted on: 10/22/06  (Edited: 10/26/06 @ 07:21) You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
A bit confused here...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/30/05
Not a big deal  jesusbits2@... | 08/30/05
Irresponsible Developers  smack_z | 08/31/05
Miro mambles ...  dmcole | 08/31/05
Get the FAQs before commenting  live2teach | 08/31/05
Like a little lamb.....  xgrendel | 09/01/05
Message has been deleted.  myfevertoy | 10/22/06
Mambo/OSM is the proof - OS works  gkanks_z | 08/31/05
The split is not unprecented  km4hr@... | 08/31/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline