On TechRepublic: Five super-secret features in Windows 7
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

July 7th, 2009

Will Microsoft promise split the open source movement

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn @ 5:47 am

Categories: Development, Distributions, FOSS, GPL, General, Linux, Linux Server OS, Microsoft, Standards, management

Tags: Mono, Ubuntu, Open Source Movement, Microsoft Corp., Richard Stallman, .Net, Open Source, Development Tools, Software Development, Software/Web Development

When we last left “As the .Net Turns,” Richard Stallman was promising that Microsoft would never, ever marry his open source daughter.

Now Microsoft has raised the tension in the room by giving that daughter a ring, to the cheers of the rest of her family.

We join our show already in progress.


Microsoft’s announcement that it will invoke its community promise regarding C# and the Common Language Infrastructure may be causing a split between the Free Software Foundation and Ubuntu.

The promise was made to reinforce Ubuntu’s decision to support Mono, an open source implementation of  Microsoft’s .Net which includes the two technologies, in an  installation of Debian Linux, on which Ubuntu is based.

The move doesn’t clearly put Mono under the Community Promise, however.

Stallman edited his anti-Mono screed last night, noting that the Debian supporting Mono is not the default version, but he has not yet backed down from his criticisms.

With Debian and Ubuntu now accepting Microsoft’s word that Mono is truly open source and Stallman staying outside the tent, there is a growing political split at the heart of the free software movement.

The split is over whether Microsoft’s promise on C# and the CLI extends to Mono and whether the Mono version of .Net should be accepted as a standard part of Linux.

If it is, then Microsoft may be embraced as an “open core” vendor like other enterprise open source companies.

If Stallman and the FSF stay outside the growing consensus that open source .Net is legitimate, on the other hand, they could find themselves isolated.

But if “open core” is a perfectly legitimate open source stance, users may always wonder what is inside the core and what outside, an ambiguity vendors (starting with Microsoft) could use to end the free software era.

Stay tuned.


But before you do, answer this. Will you TiVo past the commercials?

Dana BlankenhornDana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for 30 years, a tech freelancer since 1983. You can follow Dana on Twitter. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Dana Blankenhorn

Subscribe to Linux and Open Source via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 49 Talkback(s)
Your funny
Yes, I do know VMS very well, and the lead developer of VMS worked on the NT kernel but there are very few similarities between NT and VMS I wish there were. VMS is an awesome, powerfull, secure and e... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Aussie_Troll Posted on: 07/10/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Can't change the spots on a Leopard's back.  Dietrich T. Schmitz | 07/07/09
I just removed the 'Patent Trap' from my Ubuntu 9.04 system  InAction Man | 07/07/09
I'm thinking about purging Ubuntu and Gnome...  storm14k | 07/07/09
I'm thinking about that too  InAction Man | 07/07/09
I have been considering giving Ubuntu the boot as well.  devlin_X | 07/07/09
Ubu  handydan918@... | 07/07/09
Wait - the FLOSS Community Is Being Asked to Trust - Micro$haft?!?!?  drprodny | 07/08/09
Irrelevant split, IMO  markbn | 07/07/09
Legal reasoning behind that?  NetArch. | 07/07/09
Legal reasoning?  markbn | 07/07/09
Stallman is a wacko  mikefarinha | 07/07/09
So he's a "wacko" because...  NetArch. | 07/07/09
Label 'stallman' any way you like, but...  mike_hauss@... | 07/08/09
Actually  daengbo | 07/08/09
Since when was the open source movement united?  George Mitchell | 07/07/09
Amen...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/07/09
And yet...  Michael Kelly | 07/07/09
You contradict yourself  de-void | 07/07/09
Re: Compatibility ...  George Mitchell | 07/07/09
Microsoft is admired for knowing when to let competitors feel at ease...  InAction Man | 07/07/09
Microsoft will use Mono code developed by community for Windows  J0sh | 07/07/09
Ermmmm ... no.  de-void | 07/07/09
And you've seen MS's code to know this? (nt)  storm14k | 07/07/09
Microsoft? Afraid of getting sued?  Ole Man | 07/07/09
Nitpicking for the sake of being contrary  zinger111 | 07/07/09
I think this is precisely the issue. Thanks  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 07/07/09
Correction, Dana  NetArch. | 07/07/09
Big difference that makes YOU wrong and Dana right  markbn | 07/07/09
What?  NetArch. | 07/07/09
Further.  NetArch. | 07/07/09
So, Stallman's license forces you to make the SOURCE CODE available and he  markbn | 07/08/09
Giving a SW for FREE is perfectly applicable to what I said  markbn | 07/08/09
You obviously don't know the difference  NetArch. | 07/08/09
free is different from Free?!  markbn | 07/09/09
RE: Will Microsoft promise split the open source movement  zinger111 | 07/07/09
What nonsense  TJD23 | 07/07/09
What nonsense - Wrong Target  bubba555 | 07/07/09
Nice novel you've written there  Ole Man | 07/07/09
Mono is a foolish risk.  peter_erskine@... | 07/07/09
What is Open Source?  tonymcs@... | 07/07/09
Exactly  Aussie_Troll | 07/07/09
LOL. THat is too funny.  someitguy79 | 07/08/09
Your funny  Aussie_Troll | 07/10/09
RE: Will Microsoft promise split the open source movement  tmark1 | 07/08/09
It isn't Microsoft's to GPL  rbethell | 07/08/09
Mono is cool  rbethell | 07/08/09
Trust Microsoft?  misceng | 07/08/09
They wouldn't stop working  rbethell | 07/08/09
Fool me once...  Tsingi | 07/08/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads