On Metacritic: BioShock 2: The reviews are in
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

August 27th, 2009

NHIN code-a-thon may change government attitude toward open source

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn @ 8:09 am

Categories: Development, Enterprise Policy, General, Government, Infrastructure, politics

Tags: Behlendorf, Open Source, Dana Blankenhorn

Tomorrow, the Department of Health and Human Services will host its first “code-a-thon” dedicated to the National Health Information Network and its Connect software.

About 80 programmers, led by Apache developer (and Collabnet employee) Brian Behlendorf, will spend about four hours trying to stamp out bugs in the open source software gateway, which is based on National Health Information Network (NHIN) conventions.

Behlendorf’s presence is not ceremonial, as CollabNet runs the military’s forge.mil open source forge site.

The code-a-thon, and the resulting code, could be a great demonstration of the power of open source in dealing with big problems like health care. The participation of Behlendorf offers hope the open source movement will have a great success.

While open source code has won approval from the Obama Administration, the processes by which such code is developed have not fared as well.

While the Veterans Administration is still working with its open source VistA platform, for instance, it has placed a moratorium on accepting code from local VA facilities. Instead of developing VistA through a network of collaborators, open source IT advocate Fred Trotter writes, “it will be centrally developed by a single, controlling entity.”

The decision may improve security and manageability of the code base, but it’s also going to slow down development, and give one contract holder control of the software.

Whether Behlendorf and his code-a-thon can give U.S. CTO Aneesh Chopra a little open source religion may be an open question. As Virginia CTO Chopra outsourced development work to India under a master contract signed with Northrup-Grumman which has since become highly controversial.

Are open source projects that are centrally controlled by single vendors really open source projects, or are they proprietary projects using open source as a feature? That’s a question the Obama Administration needs to answer if it’s to get full value from open source.

Dana BlankenhornDana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for 30 years, a tech freelancer since 1983. You can follow Dana on Twitter. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Dana Blankenhorn

Subscribe to Linux and Open Source via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 8 Talkback(s)
RE: NHIN code-a-thon may change government attitude toward open source
The NHIN is good for existing/legacy systems. But we need to move beyond this messaging paradigm into an information model paradigm for true semantic interoperability.

--Tim

Read the rest)
Posted by: tw_cook Posted on: 08/30/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Most open source IS centrally developed  Michael Kelly | 08/27/09
Most generalizations are wrong  IT_User | 08/27/09
AND...  handydan918@... | 08/27/09
@Dana Much improved  Isocrates | 08/27/09
Agree with Michael Kelly  jimmyed2000 | 08/28/09
Read the document, form your own opinion  jimmyed2000 | 08/28/09
RE: NHIN code-a-thon may change government attitude toward open source  twaynesdomain | 08/29/09
RE: NHIN code-a-thon may change government attitude toward open source  tw_cook | 08/30/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads