On mySimon: Skip Fabric Softener with Dryer Balls
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

October 6th, 2009

Red Hat offers Supremes an audacious brief

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn @ 6:26 am

Categories: General, Legal, Linux, Patents, Red Hat, politics

Tags: Software, Patent, Red Hat Inc., Software Patent, Brief, David Kappos, Tools & Techniques, Management, Dana Blankenhorn

Red Hat has filed a “friend of the court” brief to the Supreme Court in hopes of having software patents invalidated once and for all.

The brief follows the logic of the U.S. Court of Appeals in re: Bilski but asks the Supremes to go further in deciding the case, now called Bilski vs. Kappos. David Kappos is the new Undersecretary of Commerce for Intellectual property and director of the patent and trademark office.

The brief argues that lower courts erred in the 1990s, disregarding guideposts previously set by the Supreme Court and opening the floodgates for patents based merely on abstract ideas.

This is the heart of the argument:

Because the boundaries of software patents are exceedingly vague and the numbers of issued software patents is now enormous, it is virtually impossible to rule out the possibility that a new software product may arguably infringe some patent.

The brief goes on to argue that given such legal risks only the largest companies can afford to do any kind of software development, especially if it might involve real innovation.

Much of the argument is based on the 1972 case of Gottschalk vs. Benson, a decision written by the legendary William O. Douglas that invalidated a patent for turning binary-coded decimal numbers into pure binary numbers for use in a computer program.

The Benson ruling was that software was “merely a series of mathematical calculations” and thus did not constitute a “process” within the meaning of the Patent Act.

The brief even quotes Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, speaking in 1991 against the idea of software patents, arguing that if people understood how courts were moving when software was first being developed “the industry would be at a standstill today.”

It is, in sum, an audacious brief, as audacious in its way as new Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s recent argument that courts erred when they first called corporations persons in the 19th century.

Given history both arguments make sense. Given politics neither is likely to be accepted any time soon.

Dana BlankenhornDana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for 30 years, a tech freelancer since 1983. You can follow Dana on Twitter. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Dana Blankenhorn

Subscribe to Linux and Open Source via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 7 Talkback(s)
What?!?!
This is ludicrous!!!

This is crazy!!!!

Loverock, we need your credible and authoritative insight on this.... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Viva la crank dodo Posted on: 10/08/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Here's for hoping!  NetArch. | 10/06/09
RE: Red Hat offers Supremes an audacious brief  Linux Geek | 10/06/09
*** BREAKING NEWS ***  D. T. Schmitz | 10/06/09
What?!?!  Viva la crank dodo | 10/08/09
Unlikely to succeed in much need changes  Richard Flude | 10/06/09
RE: Red Hat offers Supremes an audacious brief  twaynesdomain | 10/07/09
Deleted  Viva la crank dodo | 10/08/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline