On TechRepublic: Five super-secret features in Windows 7
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

August 15th, 2006

Toward an honest GPL

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn @ 12:14 pm

Categories: General, Linux, Software Licensing, Standards, Strategy

Tags:

In Focus » See more posts on: GPL

Funambol CEO Fabrizio Capobianco (left) has a fascinating post up today about what he calls the Honest Public License, a proposal that the GPL close what he calls the "ASP loophole."

The loophole appeared as distribution of GPL software moved to the Web. When software is a service, does everything that service touch become subject to the GPL? "I have always included distribution of software as a service in my interpretation of the GPL, but I am not a lawyer," he writes.

The issue is important to Capobianco because Funambol is a mobile open source company. Everything it does is over-the-air, and service-oriented. Getting this right is essential to the development of the mobile open source space.

So this being open source, the non-lawyer then proceeds to write some legal language. (I love that about this space.) His post links to a draft of what he calls the Honest Public License, along with a page which compares this language to the present GPL.

The goal of HPL is to keep the community honest with itself. The use of the name "Honest" is ABSOLUTELY not intended to mean that GPL or any other licenses are dishonest. It is quite the opposite, actually. But some people are taking advantage of a GPL legal loophole and are defeating the spirit of the GPL. HPL is just GPL extended to cover the distribution of software as a service to the public. It does not take away any freedom (i.e. you can use it internally in your corporation), it just covers when someone distributes the code to the public (whether with a floppy or as a service). It is meant to keep people honest with their community.

Given the continuing disagreements between Linus Torvalds and the FSF concerning GPLv3, I think this is a valuable contribution. The purpose of having an open license-writing process is to find compromise, not to just give he appearance of listening while leaders impose their own solution.

We need to all find a way to get along. It’s hang together time.

Dana BlankenhornDana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for 30 years, a tech freelancer since 1983. You can follow Dana on Twitter. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Dana Blankenhorn

Subscribe to Linux and Open Source via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 6 Talkback(s)
I don't see that at all
The HPL isn't going to stop the GPL v3 forces from advancing forward with their agenda and their license.... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Swashbuckler2 Posted on: 08/22/06 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Oh good, YET ANOTHER license.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/15/06
Don't like it? Then don't use it.  Zogg | 08/16/06
Well, not exactly  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 08/16/06
I don't see that at all  Swashbuckler2 | 08/22/06
Unenforcable - too risky  drorharari | 08/17/06
Huh?  Swashbuckler2 | 08/22/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads