On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

November 1st, 2006

Another view on Oracle Linux

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn @ 11:39 am

Categories: Distributions, General, Linux, Linux Server OS, Strategy, resellers

Tags:

In Focus » See more posts on: Oracle Linux

Oracle LinusOracle's new Linux is the best thing that ever happened to the open source applications market. Especially in the enterprise space.

And, no, they're not going to fork it. Instead they're going to provide competition, with lower support prices and faster updates. Which is good for everyone.

This sunny view came to me today from Adaptive Planning CEO Bill Soward. He seems to find the cynical reaction overdone.

"This is a positive step, it reinforces why Linux is a better solution for customers and it will result in better products at lower prices. It's all about getting alternatives to Microsoft."

Ah, Microsoft. They just agreed to support Zend, didn't they? Sure, but talk about your vendor lock-in.

Microsoft will keep Oracle honest, Soward feels. RedHat isn't the game, Microsoft is.

"They don't need to make money from the operating system. To the extent that Linux flourishes that accrues to their benefit. I don't think they need to fork it – that doesn't buy them anything. I don't think that's the motivation. On the other hand customers want a single throat to choke, and Oracle makes money off maintenance, and now their maintenance offering is better. It's a reasonable thing to do."

Agree?

Which single IT throat would you prefer to choke?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Dana BlankenhornDana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for 30 years, a tech freelancer since 1983. You can follow Dana on Twitter. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Dana Blankenhorn

Subscribe to Linux and Open Source via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 18 Talkback(s)
No different than any other distro
Oracle makes their own changes. Red Hat and Suse already do so. They push changes upstream, but put those changes in their own trees without waiting for them to be accepted upstream.... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Swashbuckler2 Posted on: 11/02/06 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
talk about a two edged sword question!  whieber | 11/01/06
wow... I can agree mostly  shryko | 11/02/06
Oracle's Forking History  mxyzplk | 11/01/06
Ignore Microsoft and the analysis is good.  Anton Philidor | 11/01/06
Why ignore Microsoft?  zkiwi | 11/01/06
Because it's difficult to see...  Anton Philidor | 11/02/06
I agree  jplatt39 | 11/02/06
I don't know about that  voska | 11/02/06
So why did IBM fill their shorts then?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/01/06
Exactly why is Microsoft so scared and partners running from MS to SAP?  nomorems | 11/01/06
By definition, they *will* fork....  techboy_z | 11/01/06
No different than any other distro  Swashbuckler2 | 11/02/06
What are they gonna call it when it breaks  TonyMcS | 11/01/06
Sorry, I don't buy it.  jplatt39 | 11/01/06
more players for the same pie.  zzz1234567890 | 11/01/06
Players and Playahs  jplatt39 | 11/02/06
Oracle Fork COOL  rtb | 11/02/06
Single Throat to Choke  Swashbuckler2 | 11/02/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here