On BNET: Give your browser a panic button
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

December 7th, 2006

Is SugarCRM open source?

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn @ 10:20 am

Categories: Applications, Database Management, General, Legal, Software Licensing, marketing

Tags:

David Berlind has a long interview, available as a podcast, with SugarCRM President John Roberts today.

The key question — is SugarCRM really open source?

Roberts insists it is. The SugarCRM license merely combines elements from two existing open source licenses — the Mozilla Public License and the Attribution Assurance License.

Trouble is, Roberts pushed the new license out there before getting OSI approval for it. He believes that will come. But if it doesn't, it doesn't. He's still standing with the license he has. And he will continue calling his company "Commercial Open Source."

What's mainly at stake is a logo Sugar insists its customers display in their user interfaces, which identifies SugarCRM as the application "powering" their service.

Bruce Perens derides this as "badgeware." Roberts calls it "attribution."

Whatever. Sugar is demanding that its customers essentially market for it, if they wish to remain its customers. Which could, if it becomes common, leave user screens looking like NASCAR uniforms. (Or Talladega Nights.)

The term, as Ross Mayfield explains, comes from The Treasure of Sierra Madre, where a bandit (Alphonso Bedoya) claims to Humphrey Bogart he's the police, and Bogart notes he has no badge. "We ain't got no badges. We don't need no badges! I don't have to show you any stinking badges!!" (The picture, originally from the movie, was pulled off Ross's blog.)

Yeah, well John Roberts says you do need his badge. Or you're violating his SugarCRM license. Which is still open source, even though OSI hasn't approved it. It doesn't have the OSI badge of approval. It don't need no stinking badges. But you do. Gringo. (The Spanish for friend is amigo.)

The question to my mind is not whether Roberts is right or wrong. The question is whether this will impact anyone's decision to use SugarCRM, or contribute to SugarCRM. It's a question for the market. SugarCRM indeed does not need no stinking badges, but then you don't have to respect or contribute to it.

 

Do applications using open source require badges showing what they are made of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Dana BlankenhornDana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for 30 years, a tech freelancer since 1983. You can follow Dana on Twitter. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Dana Blankenhorn

Subscribe to Linux and Open Source via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 6 Talkback(s)
"Open Source" vs "Source Available"
Prior to the Bruce Perens, we used to call proprietary source "Source Available" in my neck of the woods. For quite some time (beginning in the early 90s) I was a reseller of SBT Database Accounting a... (Read the rest)
Posted by: dave.leigh@... Posted on: 12/09/06 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
SugarCRM is not open source  errolmars@... | 12/07/06
So, when F/OSS rabies strikes, anyone is a target?  Scrat | 12/08/06
You seem to have missed the point  dave.leigh@... | 12/09/06
The blurring of "open source" or proprietary software in disguise ...  George Mitchell | 12/07/06
A good point  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 12/08/06
"Open Source" vs "Source Available"  dave.leigh@... | 12/09/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More