On last.fm: Michael Jackson radio - Listen now!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

March 22nd, 2007

Which GPL Will Be At The Bottom Of The Incline?

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn @ 11:35 am

Categories: FOSS, GPL, General, Legal, Linux, Patents, Software Licensing, business models

Tags:

In Focus » See more posts on: Microsoft Novell, GPL, Software Patents

Let's talk some more about the open source incline. (The picture is from a political site, but I find it funny.)

The other day I noted how SugarCRM is now talking about licensing code under the GPL, rather than the modified Mozilla attribution license it has been using.

It is doing this, I wrote, for business reasons. It wants a bigger community, more contributions of code, and a better reputation in the open source world.

With Linus Torvalds and Richard Stallman now split on GPL Version 3, specifically over the issue of software patents, the question now occurs, what's the bottom of the incline? Is it GPL Version 2, or is it GPL Version 3?

This is not a question either Linus Torvalds or Richard Stallman can answer. It's not a question that truly responds well to a poll (although we'll have one). This is a market question, one that will be decided over time, by millions of decisions made all around the world.

It's the vibrancy of the communities built around Version 2 and Version 3 projects, and the level of code contributions such communities generate, that will tell the tale here. People are more likely to contribute code when they sense it's a two-way street, that the playing field between them and the project they support is level.

Do we need language against software patents in order to feel that the playing field is level? Is a license which prohibits such patents explicitly more fair than one which does not?

This is a political question, but not all political questions are subject to a vote. Some are subject to history. And the history on this question has only just begun, unless the software industry chooses to admit that software patents are more trouble than they are worth.

I'm not holding my breath on that. (You may exhale now.)

Which license is at the bottom of your open source incline?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Dana BlankenhornDana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for 30 years, a tech freelancer since 1983. You can follow Dana on Twitter. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Dana Blankenhorn

Subscribe to Linux and Open Source via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 3 Talkback(s)
RE: Which GPL Will Be At The Bottom Of The Incline?
That is a funny picture... If you want a good laugh check out " 5-George Bush funny film clips laugh at 1 for FREE!" at
... (Read the rest)
Posted by: wwwWallyButlerCom Posted on: 12/30/07 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
GPL not only choice.  william.furr@... | 03/22/07
The GPL3 will be much more popular for people doing the dual license thing.  DonnieBoy | 03/22/07
RE: Which GPL Will Be At The Bottom Of The Incline?  wwwWallyButlerCom | 12/30/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More