On mySimon: The Double-Daring Book for Girls
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

December 30th, 2005

The first question for 2006: Tenable tenable?

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn @ 8:04 am

Categories: Applications, Distributions, General, Software Licensing, Strategy

Tags:

TenableWhile open source mainly moved from strength to strength in 2005 it wasn’t all one-way traffic.

Tenable Network Security took Nessus, the open source network monitoring tool it supported, closed source with Version 3.0 this month.

The move may work. The niche where the software works, network security, is dominated by proprietary programs. Nessus, in its open source form, was losing market share. The hope is that, as a proprietary program, it can advance against rivals, and make money doing it.

But it won’t be easy. Tenable sacrificed goodwill within its user base through its decision. Nessus 2.0 has been adopted by a group called the OpenVAS Project, which has launched a fork. Software in the Public Interest, which counts Debian Linux among its projects, has given the fork its blessing.

The whole software industry will be watching closely how Tenable does in 2006. (Open source developers who feel underappreciated will be watching most closely.) If Tenable gains market share in the enterprise space, any losses among Linux users will be more than offset.

If enterprises decide they prefer to pay for Nessus 3.0 rather than go with OpenVAS, that will justify its decision further, and could encourage other Little Red Hens to do the same. And it should serve as a warning to all those who take open source work for granted that, without both give and take, value can easily be lost.

Dana BlankenhornDana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for 30 years, a tech freelancer since 1983. You can follow Dana on Twitter. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Dana Blankenhorn

Subscribe to Linux and Open Source via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 20 Talkback(s)
Downward Thinking
Downward thinking is making those immigrants feel unwelcome and like they aren't Americans. Bottom-of-the-barrel thinking is we should throw them out or not let them in.

The U.S. is a nation of immigrants. That's one of the many things that make us great.... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Erik1234 Posted on: 01/06/06 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
give and take ----- nobody gives, they only take  zzz1234567890 | 12/30/05
as expected  zzz1234567890 | 12/30/05
as expected  zzz1234567890 | 12/30/05
US a third world country  zzz1234567890 | 12/30/05
Service industry  Roger Ramjet | 01/03/06
its heading towards a third world.  zzz1234567890 | 01/03/06
Downfalls  Roger Ramjet | 01/04/06
werent you the one who wrote  zzz1234567890 | 01/04/06
note:  zzz1234567890 | 01/04/06
Good memory  Roger Ramjet | 01/05/06
a talented person like Roger is missed.  zzz1234567890 | 01/05/06
Downward Thinking  Erik1234 | 01/06/06
And the answer is . . .  Roger Ramjet | 01/03/06
why not fortune too  zzz1234567890 | 01/03/06
Why do billionaires  Roger Ramjet | 01/04/06
Bored, out-of-work and underage programmers  zzz1234567890 | 01/04/06
Not (neccessarily) better  Roger Ramjet | 01/05/06
clearing up some myths  zzz1234567890 | 01/05/06
Your both right  Erik1234 | 01/06/06
I think you should have kept up with it  zzz1234567890 | 01/05/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here