On BNET: Online porn struggles for profits
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

July 15th, 2009

To the Moon: Rocketdyne, Keeper of the Flame

Posted by Jason Perlow @ 8:28 pm

Categories: Business, General, Science

Tags: Engine, Moon, Aerospace & Defense, Workforce Management, Manufacturing, Human Resources, Jason Perlow

The historic Apollo 11 mission in July of 1969 culminated in the first manned moon landing. While many of the proud Americans who were involved in that project are no longer with us 40 years later, the technologies they built still live on, will be further refined, and will return us to that lonely world and beyond.

How We Built the Technologies (Introduction)

Boeing, the Rocket Foundry

The Integrators

Grumman, One Giant Landing for Mankind

As part of a series through the beginning of August, I am going to profile the key companies and the projects which made Apollo 11 a reality — from the firms that performed the systems integration, built and designed the avionics components, engineered and manufactured the powerful rocket engines which hurtled the mighty Saturn V into space, and created the legendary spacecraft which made history. Our third installment in our series is about Rocketdyne, the company which built and designed the mighty rocket engines for the Saturn V.

F-1 Rocket Engine Undergoing Testing

The Rocketdyne F-1 rocket engine, producing 1.5 million pounds of takeoff thrust and fueled with Liquid Kerosene (RP-1) and Liquid Oxygen was the core component of the S-IC boost stage that propelled the Apollo astronauts to the Moon. The photo above is the engine undergoing testing at Edwards Air Force Base. (Photo Courtesy Rocketdyne)

Early In 1960, the Apollo program was conceived by the Eisenhower administration as a direct sequel to the Mercury program, the United States’s first manned space program. Much of the US’s backing of the manned space program was rhetoric, until Russian Cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin aboard his Vostok 1 spacecraft made history with the world’s first orbital manned flight in April of 1961.

Click on the “Read the rest of this entry” link below for more.

Once the Soviet Union had set the bar, it was seen by the current administration — John F. Kennedy’s — as a provocation to raise the bar higher in what was clearly an escalating space race. The need to advance our space technology was not only out of a need to be superior to the Soviets from a technological perspective, but it was a political motivator to drive American industry to drive technological progress. So on May 25 of 1961, at a special joint session of Congress, President Kennedy delivered his historic statement:

First, I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely to the Earth. No single space project in this period will be more impressive to mankind, or more important in the long-range exploration of space; and none will be so difficult or expensive to accomplish.

Considering that the United States had only just sent its first Mercury astronaut, Alan Shepherd, into a 15-minute sub-orbital flight only two weeks earlier, this was a very tall order. The technology that would be needed (not to mention the money required to pull this off) would be unprecedented in terms of what had been achieved in the history of mankind. Getting one man into orbit with Project Mercury was one thing, or even two in the case of Gemini, but the rocket propulsion that would be required to get several men to the moon and back safely would need to be many of orders of magnitude more powerful than anything that had existed previously.

The company that was on the forefront of American rocket engine design was Rocketdyne, at the time a subsidiary of North American Aviation. In 1955, Rocketdyne was a company that employed about 2,500 people and was involved in cruise missile research for the United States military, producing a rocket engine for the SM-64 Navaho.  The rocket engine for the Navaho used a liquid kerosene propellant (RP-1) with liquid oxygen (LOX) as the oxidizer. The Navaho was cancelled in 1957, after several failed launches.

The canceling of the Navaho contract would have seemed to have spelled the end for kerosene-fueled rockets and Rocketdyne’s continued research, if it wasn’t for the fact that the Russians launched Sputnik into orbit, which meant that theoretically, the communists could also drop a nuclear warhead on anywhere in the United States whenever they wanted to. This accelerated the development of Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles such as the Atlas (which was also the launch platform for Project Mercury) and Intermediate and Medium Range Ballistic Missiles such as the the Thor and Jupiter, all of which Rocketdyne designed the propulsion systems for.

The Mighty F-1

Wernher von Braun dwarfed by the F-1 engines of the Saturn V S-IC.

Wernher Von Braun dwarfed by the F-1 engines of the Saturn V S-IC.

To send men to the moon, a much larger rocket engine was going to be needed. In 1960, the Marshall Space Flight Center, led by NASA’s chief rocket scientist Wernher Von Braun, determined via early calculations that they would need to design a multi-stage rocket with over 7 million pounds of thrust in its boost stage — this was many orders of magnitude above what was currently available. It eventually fell upon Rocketdyne to design a RP-1/LOX engine, eventually designated the F-1,  which would have 1.5 million pounds of takeoff thrust apiece. Five F-1s would be used on the S-IC first stage on the Saturn V, which would have a combined thrust of 7.5 million pounds.

NASA had just under 10 years in order to satisfy Kennedy’s edict to get men on the Moon. Fortunately, Rocketdyne had already done a lot of the groundwork and gained a lot of experience with Atlas, Jupiter and Thor, and had begun early development of a prototype high-thrust rocket engine for the Air Force even before NASA asked for engines with the specifications for the Saturn V boost stage. Rockedyne was testing early prototypes of the precursor to the F-1 as early as 1959. The problem now was scaling up those engines and designing turbopumps that could handle the 40,000+ gallons per minute each giant F-1 engine would consume.

Gallery: Rocketdyne F-1 and J-2 Rocket Engine Development

Needless to say the effort that went into designing and testing the F-1 engines were enormous. Turbo machinery and pressure vessels would frequently explode under the incredible forces and speeds they had to operate under and many design changes had to occur before the engine could even be flight tested. From 1957 to 1961, Rocketdyne grew from a company of 2,500 people to well over 20,000 employees, and had tremendous resources and many test facilities at their disposal. By 1961 functional F-1 engines were being tested at Edwards Air Force base on huge, oil-derrick sized platforms made to withstand over 2 million pounds of rocket thrust. The first F-1 engines flew on Apollo 4, in November of 1967.

The Versatile J-2

Rocketdyne technicians assembling J2 engines, c.1964 (Photo courtesy Rocketdyne)

Rocketdyne technicians assembling J-2 engines, c.1964 (Photo courtesy Rocketdyne)

Still, even the F-1 engine alone was not enough to send men to the Moon. While kerosene/LOX rocket engine technology was very powerful, it was also a trade off. To use the F-1 or other kerosene/LOX engines on the upper stages of the Saturn V would have meant that the rocket would have needed to be much, much heavier and much larger because of the specific impulse characteristics of RP-1 liquid rocket fuel. Instead, a completely different rocket engine technology would need to be developed that could burn a fuel with a much higher specific impulse — Liquid Hydrogen/LOX engines. Additionally, the upper stage rocket engine on the S-IVB that would send the Apollo spacecraft into Trans Lunar Injection had to be re-startable, which the F-1 was not.

The J-2 project was run in parallel with the F-1 project, and in many respects the Rocketdyne engineers working on it had much more difficult challenges to overcome than with F-1 because LOX/Hydrogen rockets were completely new technology and required development of advanced cryogenic refrigeration and coolant technology for the liquid hydrogen fuel. Each J-2 was rated at over 200,000lbs of thrust. Five were used on the S-II stage and a single J-2, which was restartable, was used on the S-IVB that carried the Command Module/Service Module to the Moon. The first J-2 made its first orbital flight on February 26, 1966 aboard a Saturn IB rocket, as part of a full test of the S-IVB stage in space.

Paul Coffman (Left) joined Rocketdyne in 1955 and worked on early engineering of the F-1 as well as component and engine testing on the J-2. Joe Stangeland (Right) joined Rocketdyne in 1957 and worked on the turbomachinery in the F-1 and the J-2 for the Saturn V.

Click to listen to a podcast with ZDNet’s Jason Perlow and Rocketdyne engineers Paul Coffman and Joe Stangeland

Rocketdyne’s Future In Space

Rocketdyne, now part of United Technogies’ Pratt and Whitney aerospace division, still continues to be a key player in the rocket propulsion industry. After Apollo, Rocketdyne was awarded the contract to build the RS-24 Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME), which are LOX/Hydrogen rocket engines that are designed to be re-usable and deliver 400,000 Lbs of thrust each. Rocketdyne also produces the RS-68, a 600,000+ Lb thrust LOX/Hydrogen engine used on the Delta IV heavy-lift launch vehicle for use in military applications.

40 years after Apollo 11, Rocketdyne has dusted off the basic J-2 design and given it a complete engineering makeover as the J-2X, with a thrust capability approaching 300,000 lbs, and will be far less expensive to produce than the SSME. In June of 2006, Rocketdyne was awarded the rocket engine contract on the Ares I, also known as “The Stick”, which which combines  a Solid Rocket Booster (SRB) from Thiokol as the first stage and a Rocketdyne J-2X on the Earth Departure Stage for the Orion spacecraft — the modern equivalent of the S-IVB on the Saturn V.

But what about the future of Moon rockets? The design characteristics of the Ares V system as part of the Constellation program are not set in stone — the Augustine commission, the special committee set up by President Obama to review the future of American human space flight, has not yet released its findings as to what the Moon rocket of the future will look like. However, it’s probably a safe bet that Rocketdyne’s RS-68 and J-2X engines will likely play a role in their design, whatever the final configuration may be.

Were you an employee of Rocketdyne during the Apollo or Shuttle eras? Talk Back and Let Me Know.

Jason PerlowJason Perlow is a technologist with over two decades of experience integrating large heterogeneous multi-vendor computing environments in Fortune 500 companies. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Follow jperlow on Twitter

Email Jason Perlow

Subscribe to Tech Broiler via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 15 Talkback(s)
And your point?
Even given that an investment at 3% of GDP would be lavish, what other spinoffs would happen out of the research and development that number indicats. I think we would be much farther ahead of where ... (Read the rest)
Posted by: zclayton3 Posted on: 07/21/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Indeed amazing technological feats, but  nizuse | 07/16/09
Yeah, ok  jperlowZDNet Moderator | 07/16/09
What's sad Jason is that we spent the next ...  mwagner@... | 07/17/09
When historians write about the last 30 years...  JohnMcGrew@... | 07/17/09
Saturn V not necessarily cheaper  jperlowZDNet Moderator | 07/18/09
I think you missed the point  JohnMcGrew@... | 07/19/09
I agree absolutely.  drednot57 | 07/17/09
Totally unrealistic  jperlowZDNet Moderator | 07/18/09
And your point?  zclayton3 | 07/21/09
RE: To the Moon: Rocketdyne, Keeper of the Flame  JeremyBoden | 07/17/09
Approximately...  Dr. John | 07/17/09
There was a rocket testing place in northern NJ.  psion@... | 07/17/09
Please tell me you're kidding. (nt)  lostarchitect | 07/17/09
We have to be missing something.  softwareFlunky | 07/20/09
Basic Chemical Rocket Designs  jperlowZDNet Moderator | 07/20/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More