On CBS.com: Share YOUR travel photos at Amazing Race
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

August 3rd, 2007

Treasury Department: Stop the IT Madness

Posted by Michael Krigsman @ 7:55 am

Categories: CIO issues, Government projects

Tags: Information Technology, Investment, U.S. Department Of Treasury, Michael Krigsman

The US Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a report criticizing how the Treasury Department spends it $2.8 billion IT budget. From the report:

While Treasury has established many of the capabilities needed to select, control, and evaluate its IT investments, the department has significant weaknesses that hamper its ability to effectively manage its investments.

———–

Treasury does not have an executive investment review board—a group of executives from IT and business units that is intended to be the final decision-making authority—that is actively engaged in the investment management process. In addition, the department does not have any policies and procedures for managing its nonmajor investments, although they represent almost 70 percent of the total number of investments. Until the department addresses these weaknesses, it will not have the investment management structure needed to effectively assess and manage the risks associated with its multibillion-dollar portfolio.

According to the report, the Treasury Department spends fully 25% of its overall budget on IT projects, yet it has no executive-level investment review committee.

Sorry, guys, but as far as I’m concerned, this is outrageous.

In contrast, let me describe IT investment governance at a large European company, where I know the guy responsible for IT. They’ve got an executive review committee consisting of key internal people joined by senior folks from their major vendors. Every IT initiative must presented to this committee for approval, before an investment is made. The committee therefore maintains oversight, ensuring that IT projects are set up to succeed. This is a good system because it works.

Now, I ask you: how can an organization spend $2.8 billion on IT without having a similar review structure? It just makes no sense.

Michael KrigsmanMichael Krigsman is CEO of Asuret, Inc., a software and consulting company dedicated to reducing software implementation failures. Click here to discuss this post with him on Twitter. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Michael Krigsman

Subscribe to IT Project Failures via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 9 Talkback(s)
The vendors actually do a good job
Perhaps these vendors actually do a great job. In this case, they are controlled and monitored carefully, and proper incentives are in place to encourage excellent results.

IT management has de... (Read the rest)
Posted by: mkrigsman@... Posted on: 08/03/07 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Outside Contractors and Political Appointees  mighetto | 08/03/07
Jackson and the 2nd US Bank  Anton Philidor | 08/03/07
Hysteresis  Yagotta B. Kidding | 08/03/07
Not Quite  mkrigsman@...ZDNet Moderator | 08/03/07
Advantage of having vendors on the Committee?  Anton Philidor | 08/03/07
The vendors have a stake  mkrigsman@...ZDNet Moderator | 08/03/07
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?  Yagotta B. Kidding | 08/03/07
The vendors actually do a good job  mkrigsman@...ZDNet Moderator | 08/03/07
Differentials work both ways  Yagotta B. Kidding | 08/03/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More