<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css" type="text/css" media="screen"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" --><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Rational rants</title>
		<link>http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe</link>
		<description>Mitch Ratcliffe's readings on tech and media</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 22:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>
		<language>en</language>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/zdnet/Ratcliffe" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
			<title>Twitter authority frenzy led to Twitter phishing meltdown</title>
			<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/Ratcliffe/~3/503591393/</link>
			<comments>http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?p=379#comments</comments>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Mitch Ratcliffe</dc:creator>
			<category><![CDATA[Business &#038; Technology]]></category>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?p=379</guid>
			<description>Folks like to know where they stand, and in recent weeks people on Twitter have been, well, all a-twitter about the idea of Twitter Authority. They want to know who is most influential—a repeat of the phenomenon that swept the blogosphere a while back. It&amp;#8217;s a human thing, but it is also the kind of [...]&lt;br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/&gt;
&lt;br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=43af7f4dc67f9bcd9467235fd555bf40&amp;p=1"&gt;&lt;img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=43af7f4dc67f9bcd9467235fd555bf40&amp;p=1"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=43af7f4dc67f9bcd9467235fd555bf40" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/Ratcliffe/~4/503591393" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?feed=rss2&amp;p=379</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?p=379</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
			<title>Amazon’s “Remembers” feature needs to go further</title>
			<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/Ratcliffe/~3/475836090/</link>
			<comments>http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?p=377#comments</comments>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 16:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Mitch Ratcliffe</dc:creator>
			<category><![CDATA[Business &#038; Technology]]></category>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?p=377</guid>
			<description>Several of my ZD Net colleagues noted the launch to Amazon&amp;#8217;s iPhone app this week. The feature that is most interesting, in my opinion, is the Amazon Remembers, which lets users snap a photo of a product with their iPhone and upload it refer to later, when shopping, and so that Amazon can attempt to [...]&lt;br style="clear: both;"/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=947cebaea4117792578f2372baff751a&amp;p=1"&gt;&lt;img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=947cebaea4117792578f2372baff751a&amp;p=1"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=947cebaea4117792578f2372baff751a" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/Ratcliffe/~4/475836090" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?feed=rss2&amp;p=377</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?p=377</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
			<title>Thanks to Google, writers’ lives may be even more thankless, unless….</title>
			<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/Ratcliffe/~3/435414967/</link>
			<comments>http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?p=374#comments</comments>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Mitch Ratcliffe</dc:creator>
			<category><![CDATA[Business &#038; Technology]]></category>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?p=374</guid>
			<description>The announcement that Google has settled its book scanning lawsuit with The Author&amp;#8217;s Guild raises all sorts of hopes for digital use of new and previously published books. But without some radical changes in the publishing industry, the results of the settlement are not going to make it easier to be a writer for a [...]&lt;br style="clear: both;"/&gt;
&lt;img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=e8062487a5916c7d562826af15246109" height="1" width="1"/&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=e8062487a5916c7d562826af15246109" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/Ratcliffe/~4/435414967" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?feed=rss2&amp;p=374</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?p=374</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
			<title>eBooks: The first step of a long change</title>
			<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/Ratcliffe/~3/399290707/</link>
			<comments>http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?p=372#comments</comments>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 00:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Mitch Ratcliffe</dc:creator>
			<category><![CDATA[Business &#038; Technology]]></category>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?p=372</guid>
			<description>After polling all of you about the right price for an eBook device and the kinds of documents you are buying, as well as doing a lot of research over the last couple months, it&amp;#8217;s clear that the eBooks market is growing. It&amp;#8217;s also clear that there are huge hurdles to overcome before we, as [...]&lt;br style="clear: both;"/&gt;
&lt;img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=05c0789966ce8be7761ec368a4d70bf3" height="1" width="1"/&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=05c0789966ce8be7761ec368a4d70bf3" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/Ratcliffe/~4/399290707" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?feed=rss2&amp;p=372</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?p=372</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
			<title>Inner8.com launches: Here are 100 early access invites to new stock site</title>
			<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/Ratcliffe/~3/393669345/</link>
			<comments>http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?p=371#comments</comments>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 23:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Mitch Ratcliffe</dc:creator>
			<category><![CDATA[Business &#038; Technology]]></category>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?p=371</guid>
			<description>Inner8.com, a new investing intelligence site, goes live today. I&amp;#8217;ve got 100 invites, so if you&amp;#8217;d like to try it out, click below. 
Inner8 started out as Jambaz.com more than a year ago. I participated in their early testing and, after they tried some ideas, the team went back and built something really impressive, which [...]&lt;br style="clear: both;"/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=b59e42ff30b57218198c4f725cd49534"&gt;&lt;img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=b59e42ff30b57218198c4f725cd49534"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=b59e42ff30b57218198c4f725cd49534" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/Ratcliffe/~4/393669345" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?feed=rss2&amp;p=371</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?p=371</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
			<title>LHC, Genomics and the era of massive data sets</title>
			<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/Ratcliffe/~3/389855179/</link>
			<comments>http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?p=370#comments</comments>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Mitch Ratcliffe</dc:creator>
			<category><![CDATA[Business &#038; Technology]]></category>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?p=370</guid>
			<description>The world won&amp;#8217;t end when the Large Hadron Collider makes its anticipated first collision of high-energy particles later this month, but it will produce an explosion of data. The LHC will produce as much data in a single day of experimentation as many scientists dealt with in a lifetime only a decade ago. Genomics data, [...]&lt;br style="clear: both;"/&gt;
&lt;img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=1d958f36eb5c6f35b95e1660eea6125c" height="1" width="1"/&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=1d958f36eb5c6f35b95e1660eea6125c" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/Ratcliffe/~4/389855179" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?feed=rss2&amp;p=370</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?p=370</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
			<title>Social design advice for Starbucks</title>
			<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/Ratcliffe/~3/387038895/</link>
			<comments>http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?p=365#comments</comments>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 21:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Mitch Ratcliffe</dc:creator>
			<category><![CDATA[Business &#038; Technology]]></category>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?p=365</guid>
			<description>Starbucks announced today it will begin a daily &amp;#8220;Good Sheet&amp;#8221; of news about politics, health care and other issues that it will distribute in its stores as a way to start conversations. According to a Starbucks executive quoted by The Motley Fool, the company is looking for &amp;#8220;conversation starters.&amp;#8221; It is also looking at launching [...]&lt;br style="clear: both;"/&gt;
&lt;img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=3f299d42b65b33b1f415a314016f3ed1" height="1" width="1"/&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=3f299d42b65b33b1f415a314016f3ed1" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/Ratcliffe/~4/387038895" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?feed=rss2&amp;p=365</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?p=365</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
			<title>Microsoft builds $300M cathedral to Bill Gates, hires Jerry Seinfeld as Pope</title>
			<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/Ratcliffe/~3/384502661/</link>
			<comments>http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?p=364#comments</comments>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 20:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Mitch Ratcliffe</dc:creator>
			<category><![CDATA[Business &#038; Technology]]></category>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?p=364</guid>
			<description>I&amp;#8217;m just having a little fun&amp;#8230;. I don&amp;#8217;t get the Seinfeld commercial. They are selling Bill, not Windows. What&amp;#8217;s with that? Bill retired in July. 
This just in from Adweek&amp;#8217;s commercials critic, Barbara Lippert:
The Future. Delicious&amp;#8221; is the sign-off, but I am permanently grossed out by the vision of Gates&amp;#8217; ass wink.
Also, why would they [...]&lt;br style="clear: both;"/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=97f41f633a510e360ddc07b08ddefe4b"&gt;&lt;img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=97f41f633a510e360ddc07b08ddefe4b"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=97f41f633a510e360ddc07b08ddefe4b" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/Ratcliffe/~4/384502661" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?feed=rss2&amp;p=364</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?p=364</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
			<title>Should political postings stay or go? A survey.</title>
			<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/Ratcliffe/~3/383714347/</link>
			<comments>http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?p=363#comments</comments>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 00:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Mitch Ratcliffe</dc:creator>
			<category><![CDATA[Business &#038; Technology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Social &#038; Political]]></category>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?p=363</guid>
			<description>I&amp;#8217;ve been blogging for ZD Net for several years, writing for ZD publications for almost 20 years. I&amp;#8217;ve always found readers to be intelligent and thoughtful, which is why I continue to do this while doing other things as &amp;#8220;work.&amp;#8221; My posting, A virus in your genes, think about that, yesterday elicited an interesting range [...]&lt;br style="clear: both;"/&gt;
&lt;img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=fb294680d16aff2c1320449081c1e6b0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=fb294680d16aff2c1320449081c1e6b0" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/Ratcliffe/~4/383714347" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?feed=rss2&amp;p=363</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?p=363</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
			<title>A virus in our genes, think about that….</title>
			<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/Ratcliffe/~3/382458866/</link>
			<comments>http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?p=362#comments</comments>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 16:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Mitch Ratcliffe</dc:creator>
			<category><![CDATA[Social &#038; Political]]></category>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?p=362</guid>
			<description>Really fascinating news: Virus is passed from parent to child in the DNA. Researchers found that roseola, an infection that everyone apparently gets but only 20 percent of children develop the characteristic rash that gives it its name, is actually in our DNA. It co-evolved into us, which raises some very interesting today in particular.
They [...]&lt;br style="clear: both;"/&gt;
&lt;img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=a4e76b3f232f8f8787d4324807d72a8b" height="1" width="1"/&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=a4e76b3f232f8f8787d4324807d72a8b" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/Ratcliffe/~4/382458866" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?feed=rss2&amp;p=362</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?p=362</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
