On CBS MoneyWatch: 5 Best College Towns to Live In
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

September 28th, 2008

Recap: Information warfare and the 2008 presidential election

Posted by Adam O'Donnell @ 11:59 pm

Categories: Complex Attacks, Data theft, Governments, Spam and Phishing, United States of America

Tags: Presidential Election, Campaign, Internet, Phishing, Cyberthreats, E-mail, Spam, Security, Viruses And Worms, Spam And Phishing

Mudslinging in presidential elections is as old as the American political system. The Internet has increased both the rate as well as the quantity of attack strains. The low cost and accessibility of Internet technology has placed the power to disrupt a presidential campaign in the hands of the average American. Someone with far more technical abilities can wreak far more damage.

It doesn’t take a computer hacker to create, distribute, and comment on disinformation. Technologies like YouTube has made gaffs and inappropriateness permanent and viral. For example, anyone interested in our potential executive officer’s previous and current religious leadership can watch 30 second clips Obama’s ex-pastor or Palin’s current church ad nauseum.

Combatting Internet-spread disinformation is challenging as well. While the swift-boat crew of 2004 can easily be tracked down, this is not true of disinformation efforts spread on the Internet, such as the “Obama is a Muslum”" meme. It took a researcher at Princeton’s IAS to track down the root of the e-mail.

Technologically advanced political operatives can do far more damage. While Internet fundraising has been critical to the financial solvency of both campaigns, Barack Obama has raised volumes of cash via the web. Earlier this year, Oliver Friedrichs and his team looked in depth at the impact of phishing on presidential candidate’s websites. If variations on BarackObama.com were registered by someone with malicious intent, such as a gray-zone 503c group, and subsequently used as a phishing target, it could have cut into both the credibility of the fundraising route as well as the available pool of capital.

The attack on Sarah Palin’s e-mail was not simply a major data leakage event. Even without the opposition finding anything damaging that could be used in the campaign, McCain’s people were forced into sinking precious time and energy into analysis and countermeasures surrounding the event. Secondary effects from such distractions must also be considered in the impact calculus, such as the temporary loss of control of McCain’s media mindshare during the event.

I don’t want to speculate what the rest of this campaign will bring, nor what we will see in future elections. Our increasing reliance upon this medium means whatever we see will be interesting.

Adam O'DonnellAdam J. O'Donnell, Ph.D. is an R&D engineer who has focused on computer security since 2000. He currently is the Director of Emerging Technologies at Cloudmark, a messaging security company located in San Francisco. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Adam O'Donnell

Subscribe to Zero Day via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 4 Talkback(s)
RE: Recap: Information warfare and the 2008 presidential election
Call it circle, call it square, it's still the circle in the square. Who eye's over it get's the point. That's the Medium and the Message.


Regards
dePaul Consiglio
NYMetroCityStateUS... (Read the rest)
Posted by: depaulconsiglio Posted on: 10/06/08 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Information warfare  Chad_z | 09/29/08
All of the misinformation and drive by media  zmud | 09/29/08
The President is the smartest guy in the country  BALTHOR | 10/02/08
RE: Recap: Information warfare and the 2008 presidential election  depaulconsiglio | 10/06/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here