On TV.com: CHUCK Spied a Return Date
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

May 31st, 2007

Unprotected Google directory spills database data

Posted by Ryan Naraine @ 9:06 am

Categories: Botnets, Browsers, Data theft, Exploit code, Google, Hackers, Metasploit, Mozilla, Open source, Passwords, Patch Watch, Pen testing, Privacy, Vulnerability research, Zero-day attacks

Tags: Directory, Google Inc., Database, Ryan Naraine

In Focus » See more posts on: Google Security

Google has hurriedly fixed a gaping hole in its Web page removal request tool after outsiders discovered they could traverse up the directory root, browse folders and find weak database passwords.

Google site removal

The flaw, first reported by Earl of Grey’s blog, exposed an unprotected internal Google directory. The Hacker Webzine poked around and found some fun stuff:

Apparently it is a simple directory that wasn’t protected, so we can traverse up their directory root and browse folders. A study gave me the impression this hole is unique, legit and not a honey pot. Now it can happen the best of the best that a directory becomes readable. But, one must never, ever, not in a million years, store your database connection info in a folder that can be viewed remotely. Like the www folder.

And it looks like Google has a password-strength problem:

What strikes me most is that they log in as root user and second the utter simplicity of the used passwords: 6 chars long 4 digits and two letters in the first one. A little ironic regarding Google’s advisory on password strength.

A rar file with some of the exposed data is available here. More from RSnake.

Ryan NaraineRyan Naraine is a journalist and security evangelist at Kaspersky Lab. He manages Threatpost.com, a security news portal. Here is Ryan's full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.


Email Ryan Naraine

For daily updates on Ryan's activities, follow him on Twitter.

Subscribe to Zero Day via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 12 Talkback(s)
Google doesn't test.
Because they are so smart.

http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=48

(from the above, Alan Warren, Google's director of ... (Read the rest)
Posted by: hickum Posted on: 06/01/07 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
And Google wants everyone to trust  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/31/07
Every company...  KTLA | 05/31/07
Excuse me?  frgough | 05/31/07
I have to agree, Google DOES know better.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/31/07
it was probably a lazy developer.. they are always doing this stuff.  Been_Done_Before | 06/01/07
Not "slack"  KTLA | 06/01/07
Yeah, but  xuniL_z | 06/01/07
It has begun  John Zern | 05/31/07
It began a while back  Boot_Agnostic | 06/01/07
There's a reason for proper design and testing.  kraterz | 05/31/07
"reputation"?  KTLA | 06/01/07
Google doesn't test.  hickum | 06/01/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors
advertisement

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here