On Metacritic: How to predict the Oscar winners
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

August 25th, 2009

Research: 80% of Web users running unpatched versions of Flash/Acrobat

Posted by Dancho Danchev @ 5:41 am

Categories: Adobe, Anti Virus, Arbitrary Code Execution, Botnets, Browsers, Flash, Hackers, Malware, Passwords, Patch Watch, Pen testing, Research

Tags: Adobe Systems Inc., Web, Truesteer, Spyware, Adware & Malware, Cyberthreats, Web Browsers, Security, Dancho Danchev

According to a research published by Trusteer earlier this month, 79.5% of the 2.5 million users of their Rapport security service run a vulnerable version of Adobe Flash, with 83.5% also running a vulnerable version of Acrobat.

The company has also criticized Adobe by insisting that their update mechanism “does not meet the requirements of a system that is used by 99% of users on the Internet and is highly targeted by criminals“, but is praising the update mechanism of Google’s Chrome and Firefox, whose silent updates close the window of opportunity for malicious attackers to take advantage of.

Trusteer’s research findings come a month after Secunia found out that Adobe is shipping an insecure version of Reader from its official site, justifying the action with the built-in updater, which apparently is not used by the 2.5 million users mentioned in the research, followed by an advice given in the SANS NewsBites newsletter, issue 61, that organizations should limit the use of Adobe products in order to minimize the attack surface.

Due to the high market penetration of Adobe’s products, it’s fairly logical to witness an increase of malicious exploitation of Adobe related vulnerabilities. However, there aren’t any web malware exploitation kits in the wild that are exclusively relying on Adobe-specific vulnerabilities. Instead, the exploits-mix that is served upon successful browser recognition attempts to exploit the most common applications found on a particular PC in order to increase the probability of successful infection.

Data published by Secunia two months ago, indicates the same trend that cybercriminals have been aware of for a while now, namely, that the average insecure program per PC rate is still high, with 3 insecure programs in the U.S on average, and 4 insecure programs per PC in Europe based on the company’s data. The company published similar findings two years, providing that an unpatched vulnerability is just as handy as a zero day one from the perspective of the cybercriminal who’s efficiently infecting hundreds of thousands of users by exploiting outdated/unpatched flaws.

Adobe’s products aren’t an exception, they’re targeted in between the rest of the vulnerabilities included in the exploits-mix. Don’t just make sure that you’re running the latest version of Flash and Reader, make sure that you’re running the latest versions of all the applications on your PC, before cybercriminals do the check for you.

Dancho DanchevDancho Danchev is an independent security consultant and cyber threats analyst, with extensive experience in open source intelligence gathering, malware and cybercrime incident response. He's been an active security blogger since 2007, and maintains a popular security blog. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Dancho Danchev

Subscribe to Zero Day via Email alerts or RSS.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 25 Talkback(s)
Re: Adobe's horrible process
Not to mention the Internet bandwith on your circuit that's used up by hundreds (or maybe thousands) of users downloading 30 MB updates. This goes against good Internet security practice too, you gene... (Read the rest)
Posted by: cerving Posted on: 09/10/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Thank goodness for regular updates from Adobe's RPM repository!  Zogg | 08/25/09
RE: Research: 80% of Web users running unpatched versions of Flash/Acrobat  securityboy | 08/25/09
RE: Research: 80% of Web users running unpatched versions of Flash/Acrobat  jagdogg1975@... | 08/25/09
Adobe's horrible "process"  bmgoodman | 08/25/09
Adobe Updates  kmbogus@... | 08/25/09
I doubt there are alternatives to Adobe Flash Player...  Grayson Peddie | 08/25/09
Hooking MS  tikigawd | 08/26/09
Re: Adobe's horrible process  cerving | 09/10/09
Constantly bombarded w/updates  Net-Tech_z | 08/25/09
RE: Research: 80% of Web users running unpatched versions of Flash/Acrobat  znetlol | 08/25/09
One reason more people haven't updated.  terry flores | 08/25/09
Foxit Reader FTW!!!  Grayson Peddie | 08/25/09
Foxit Follows Adobe In Open Vulnerabilities....  dunn@... | 08/26/09
Not only the programs  Michael Kelly | 08/26/09
RE: Research: 80% of Web users running unpatched versions of Flash/Acrobat  mmrbm@... | 08/26/09
This further demonstrates  Michael Kelly | 08/26/09
Opening PDFs in a browser is arcane & how I got the latest Flash version  valvestate@... | 08/26/09
RE: Research: 80% of Web users running unpatched versions of Flash/Acrobat  cgrosse23 | 08/26/09
RE: Research: 80% of Web users running unpatched versions of Flash/Acrobat  bigbearking@... | 08/26/09
RE: Research: 80% of Web users running unpatched versions of Flash/Acrobat  Ed999 | 08/26/09
RE: Research: 80% of Web users running unpatched versions of Flash/Acrobat  jimk_z | 08/27/09
OS-level update system for 3rd-party software? NO  cquirke | 08/27/09
Web users with XP Limited account  wboyer3635@... | 08/27/09
What about Secunia?  Harris-E | 08/27/09
RE: Research: 80% of Web users running unpatched versions of Flash/Acrobat  colin@... | 08/27/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here