<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css" type="text/css" media="screen"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" --><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Zero Day</title>
		<link>http://blogs.zdnet.com/security</link>
		<description>Tracking the hackers</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>
		<language>en</language>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/zdnet/security" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
			<title>A roadmap for the Twitter CSO</title>
			<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/security/~3/505561735/</link>
			<comments>http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2359#comments</comments>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Adam O'Donnell</dc:creator>
			<category><![CDATA[Hackers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Spam and Phishing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Phishing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Web Applications]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Social Networking Applications]]></category>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2359</guid>
			<description>The folks at Twitter had to deal with an attack from both phishers and hackers over the past few days.  As someone who has been in their shoes many times before, I deeply sympathize with their team and I understand the amount of work that they need to do.  For those of you [...]&lt;br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/&gt;
&lt;br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=3536a5d587b6c6da898a6d09e392430f&amp;p=1"&gt;&lt;img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=3536a5d587b6c6da898a6d09e392430f&amp;p=1"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=3536a5d587b6c6da898a6d09e392430f" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/security/~4/505561735" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2359</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2359</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
			<title>Bogus LinkedIn profiles serving malware</title>
			<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/security/~3/504783765/</link>
			<comments>http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2358#comments</comments>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Dancho Danchev</dc:creator>
			<category><![CDATA[Hackers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Passwords]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Anti Virus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Social Networking Applications]]></category>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2358</guid>
			<description>A currently active malware campaign is taking advantage of bogus LinkedIn profiles impersonating celebrities in an attempt to trick users into clicking on links serving bogus media players. LinkedIn is among the latest social networking services considered as a valuable asset in the arsenal of the blackhat SEO knowledgeable cybecriminal, simply because this approach works. [...]&lt;br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/&gt;
&lt;br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=ad10344678334a6e720fb529ae48150a&amp;p=1"&gt;&lt;img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=ad10344678334a6e720fb529ae48150a&amp;p=1"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=ad10344678334a6e720fb529ae48150a" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/security/~4/504783765" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2358</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2358</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
			<title>Thousands of Israeli web sites under attack</title>
			<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/security/~3/504720163/</link>
			<comments>http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2355#comments</comments>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Dancho Danchev</dc:creator>
			<category><![CDATA[Hackers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Pen testing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Passwords]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Governments]]></category>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2355</guid>
			<description>In the wake of the escalating conflict between Israel and Hamas, it didn&amp;#8217;t take long before pro-Hamas supporters organized themselves and started to defacing thousands of pro-Israeli web sites in order to use them as vehicles for propaganda &amp;#8212; Israel is meanwhile hijacking TV signals.
For the time being, pro-Israeli sites remain automatically probed for web [...]&lt;br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/&gt;
&lt;br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=23445d35df342903a1a2777b17c88539&amp;p=1"&gt;&lt;img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=23445d35df342903a1a2777b17c88539&amp;p=1"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=23445d35df342903a1a2777b17c88539" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/security/~4/504720163" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2355</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2355</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
			<title>Twitter phishing… inside Twitter</title>
			<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/security/~3/502874959/</link>
			<comments>http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2349#comments</comments>
			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 23:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Adam O'Donnell</dc:creator>
			<category><![CDATA[Spam and Phishing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Phishing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Social Networking Applications]]></category>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2349</guid>
			<description>Over the weekend I received a handful of reports of individuals using Direct Messages inside of Twitter to phish for Twitter accounts and passwords.

A cluster of compromised Twitter accounts are sending out person-to-person phishing messages inside the Twitter network.  These messages and the target website are similar to standard social network phishing messages, except [...]&lt;br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/&gt;
&lt;br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=af2797e2c121196b8b7da169ef075cb9&amp;p=1"&gt;&lt;img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=af2797e2c121196b8b7da169ef075cb9&amp;p=1"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=af2797e2c121196b8b7da169ef075cb9" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/security/~4/502874959" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2349</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2349</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
			<title>Real plugs critical holes in Helix Server</title>
			<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/security/~3/501225606/</link>
			<comments>http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2348#comments</comments>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 20:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Naraine</dc:creator>
			<category><![CDATA[Patch Watch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Vulnerability research]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Responsible disclosure]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Exploit code]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Data theft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Pen testing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Digital rights management]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Denial of Service (DoS)]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Arbitrary Code Execution]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Locally Running Web Servers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Complex Attacks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mobile (In)Security]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2348</guid>
			<description>RealNetworks has shipped a new version of its Helix Server to plug at least four vulnerabilities that introduce code execution and denial-of-service risks.
The flaws affect Helix Server Version 11.x, Helix Server Version 12.x, Helix Mobile Server Version 11.x and  Helix Mobile Server Version 12.x.  Three of the four bugs are considered &amp;#8220;highly critical&amp;#8221; because [...]&lt;br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/&gt;
&lt;br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=4ebef30730c9b0071fae6541c70d0fee&amp;p=1"&gt;&lt;img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=4ebef30730c9b0071fae6541c70d0fee&amp;p=1"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=4ebef30730c9b0071fae6541c70d0fee" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/security/~4/501225606" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2348</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2348</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
			<title>Adobe Flash, Apple Safari fail privacy test</title>
			<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/security/~3/501212685/</link>
			<comments>http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2346#comments</comments>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 19:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Naraine</dc:creator>
			<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Vulnerability research]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Punditocracy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Exploit code]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Data theft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Arbitrary Code Execution]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Google Chrome]]></category>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2346</guid>
			<description>Third party plug-ins like Adobe Flash do a poor job of cleaning traces of your browser sessions, rendering private-browsing features somewhat useless, according to a new study by researcher Katherine McKinley.
McKinley, a researcher at iSec Partners, created a tool for testing the functionality of clearing private data after a browser session and browsing in private [...]&lt;br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/&gt;
&lt;br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=15835219d70d4ad6315626e01636b0f4&amp;p=1"&gt;&lt;img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=15835219d70d4ad6315626e01636b0f4&amp;p=1"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=15835219d70d4ad6315626e01636b0f4" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/security/~4/501212685" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2346</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2346</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
			<title>Military contractor “cyber-defense” gold rush begins</title>
			<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/security/~3/501202923/</link>
			<comments>http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2345#comments</comments>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 19:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Adam O'Donnell</dc:creator>
			<category><![CDATA[Punditocracy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Governments]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[United States of America]]></category>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2345</guid>
			<description>Sensing a shift in upcoming defense priorities, Lockheed and Boeing are both launching information security product divisions.

Bloomberg is reporting that both Lockheed Martin and Boeing are building security product groups to address the military&amp;#8217;s needs in defending cyberspace.  I doubt that the military requires technology to &amp;#8220;defend cyberspace&amp;#8221; that is fundamentally different technology than [...]&lt;br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/&gt;
&lt;br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=73191b64de0139c7f4959cee8cb93ddb&amp;p=1"&gt;&lt;img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=73191b64de0139c7f4959cee8cb93ddb&amp;p=1"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=73191b64de0139c7f4959cee8cb93ddb" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/security/~4/501202923" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2345</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2345</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
			<title>MD5/rogue CA attack: The sky is not falling</title>
			<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/security/~3/499529634/</link>
			<comments>http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2343#comments</comments>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 15:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Naraine</dc:creator>
			<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Vulnerability research]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Punditocracy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Responsible disclosure]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Spam and Phishing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Exploit code]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Phishing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Arbitrary Code Execution]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Complex Attacks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Anti Virus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2343</guid>
			<description>Guest post by John Viega
 Today there’s been a lot of buzz about the clever new attack on public key infrastructure from Alex Sotirov and a team of researchers.   In the attack, the bad guy ends up with his own Certification Authority (CA) that is fully trusted according to every major browser. People are [...]&lt;br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/&gt;
&lt;br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=5116375dbaa4dd4bb53f1ebfa46e08de&amp;p=1"&gt;&lt;img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=5116375dbaa4dd4bb53f1ebfa46e08de&amp;p=1"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=5116375dbaa4dd4bb53f1ebfa46e08de" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/security/~4/499529634" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2343</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2343</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
			<title>An easy fix ignored</title>
			<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/security/~3/498981275/</link>
			<comments>http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2341#comments</comments>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 23:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Naraine</dc:creator>
			<category><![CDATA[Zero-day attacks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Vulnerability research]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Punditocracy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Responsible disclosure]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Exploit code]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Passwords]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Phishing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Arbitrary Code Execution]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Complex Attacks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2341</guid>
			<description>Guest post by Chris Eng
In the wake of this morning&amp;#8217;s 25C3 presentation by Alex Sotirov and Jacob Appelbaum, most of the coverage I&amp;#8217;ve read so far has focused on the technical details and real-world impact of their findings. Rightly so &amp;#8212; their paper describing the attack is a fascinating read filled with enough gory details [...]&lt;br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/&gt;
&lt;br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=939178fb75f30e46735df9a73c922bd5&amp;p=1"&gt;&lt;img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=939178fb75f30e46735df9a73c922bd5&amp;p=1"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=939178fb75f30e46735df9a73c922bd5" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/security/~4/498981275" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2341</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2341</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
			<title>SSL broken! Hackers create rogue CA certificate using MD5 collisions</title>
			<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/security/~3/498627625/</link>
			<comments>http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2339#comments</comments>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 14:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Naraine</dc:creator>
			<category><![CDATA[Zero-day attacks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Punditocracy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Responsible disclosure]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Spam and Phishing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Spyware and Adware]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Botnets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Exploit code]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Data theft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Phishing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Arbitrary Code Execution]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Complex Attacks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2339</guid>
			<description>Using computing power from a cluster of 200 PS3 game consoles and about $700 in test digital certificates, a group of hackers in the U.S. and Europe  have found a way to target a known weakness in the MD5 algorithm to create a rogue Certification Authority (CA), a breakthrough that allows the forging of [...]&lt;br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/&gt;
&lt;br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=50841798b8b4092908c4bcdbe36bc2b1&amp;p=1"&gt;&lt;img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=50841798b8b4092908c4bcdbe36bc2b1&amp;p=1"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=50841798b8b4092908c4bcdbe36bc2b1" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/security/~4/498627625" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2339</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2339</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
