On mySimon: Dragon Eye Oolong Tea
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

March 19th, 2009

SOA without service-enabled applications?

Posted by Joe McKendrick @ 8:00 am

Categories: Business ROI, Enterprise Architecture, Event processing, General, Management, SOA Surveys and Research, Vendor Watch

Tags: Oracle Corp., SOA, Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA), Web Services, Middleware, Enterprise Software, Software, Joe McKendrick

“SOA Possible Even Without Service-Enabled Apps.”

This is a statement that goes against the conventional wisdom, so, being a fan of things that go against conventional wisdom, I checked out this Q&A interview with Shailender Kumar, vice president of Oracle Fusion Middleware for Oracle India, to see what his thinking was. I wasn’t dissapointed.

As Kumar put it, the idea that SOA requires that participating applications be service-oriented is a “myth.” Most IT shops, in fact, will have a mix of approaches. There will be legacy systems, and there will be “modern” systems, there will be all kinds of middleware and messaging brokers. As he explains it:

“If you have an application that is service-enabled, and a whole bunch of applications that are not service-enabled, you can still connect these by deploying adapters. Once [people] realize that, they start to see where SOA can fit in bringing connectivity between diverse transaction engines.”

Oracle’s strategy is to position Fusion as the platform that will bring together a lot of diverse assets from across the enterprise into a service layer, and, not surprisingly, this is reflected in Kumar’s statement. But unless an organization throws out all its systems and starts entirely from scratch these days, most SOA efforts will be very ungainly and unique contraptions — and that’s okay. In surveys I have seen and conducted, even the most advanced SOA-savvy companies have less than 20% of their portfolios SOA-ready. And, of course, JBOWS is the predominant architecture at this point. And that’s okay, too. It’s a stage in evolution. And in all likelihood, there will be no compelling need to service-enable 100% of everything.

But SOA is in a lot of places, Kumar also reminds us. For example, every time we order from Amazon (an Oracle Fusion customer), the order is processed via a service-oriented framework.

Joe McKendrickJoe McKendrick is an author and consultant with deep knowledge and insights regarding trends and developments in the technology industry. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.


Email Joe McKendrick

Subscribe to Service Oriented via Email alerts or RSS.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 11 Talkback(s)
Single vendor is okay
SOA is about services, not vendors.

SO principles don't care if one uses one vendor or 1000 vendors.

What matters is the architecture definition and the components specified within. Mapp... (Read the rest)
Posted by: reamon@... Posted on: 03/23/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
This is EA or IA  reamon@... | 03/19/09
Re: This is EA or IA  Joe McKendrickZDNet Moderator | 03/19/09
True on the architecture part  reamon@... | 03/19/09
SOA requires that (most) components be services  reamon@... | 03/19/09
Single Vendor SOA  mikojava | 03/19/09
Re: Single Vendor SOA  Joe McKendrickZDNet Moderator | 03/20/09
Single vendor is okay  reamon@... | 03/23/09
Fusion might be a good tool to use  reamon@... | 03/19/09
RE: SOA without service-enabled applications?  santhoshp2004 | 03/19/09
Service-enable instead of upgrade  Joe McKendrickZDNet Moderator | 03/20/09
RE: SOA without service-enabled applications?  harshalkp | 03/20/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Click Here

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here