On TechRepublic: Windows 7: Slower to boot than Vista?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

November 10th, 2008

What's next after server virtualization? Orchestration

Posted by Dan Kusnetzky @ 3:00 am

Categories: Managing virtualized environments, Operating system virtualization/partitioning, Virtual machine software, Virtual processing software, Virtualization

Tags: Data Center, Server, Resource, Server Virtualization, Data Centers, Virtualization, Storage, Productivity, Cloud Computing, Storage Management

There are a number of steps an organization could take after successfully executing a server consolidation strategy. One of them is to orchestrate workloads to make maximum use of physical server capacity, reduce power consumption, reduce administrative and operational expenses and create an environment which can assure that each and every workload can meet service level objectives. This usually requires tools to do the following things:

  • Discover available resources such as physical systems, virtual systems, network virtualization resources and storage resources
  • Catalog these resources allowing management of these resource by workload, business unit, location of physical systems and other useful categories
  • Evaluate current usage of resources
  • Model or calculate best possible use of datacenter resources based upon policies, service level objectives or other metrics
  • Dynamically reassign or re-purposeĀ  resources as required to comply with policies, meet service level objectives and the like
  • Continue to scan the environment to manage events based upon time, occurrence of specific events, capacity considerations and ongoing workload demands

Since the datacenter of any typical large organization includes mainframes, midrange systems, industry standard systems, network systems, storage systems and power management systems, the best tools would be able to include any and all of these resources in its dynamic modeling and automation function. Sad to say, most available tools simply can’t do this. Some “forward looking” statements from major vendors in the virtualization technology space speak about “datacenter operating systems” and only mention the industry standard systems on this list. Organizations need more than this to effectively deal with the issues they face on a daily basis.

I’m only aware of two suppliers that routinely speak if this complete list when they speak about their orchestration and automation systems - Cassatt and Sun. There are a few others that actually have this capability, such as HP and IBM, but they don’t focus on it in their public statements.

If your organization had such powerful tools at its disposal, would it deploy them?

Dan KusnetzkyDaniel Kusnetzky is a member of the senior management team of The 451 Group. He is responsible for research and publications on a broad array of technology topics. He examines emerging technology trends, vendor strategies, research and development issues, and end-user integration requirements. You can follow Dan on Twitter. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Dan Kusnetzky

Subscribe to Virtually Speaking via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 3 Talkback(s)
As with most things.. you cannot fully automate things for every system...
Yet.

I think we are getting there, software is getting smarter.. but in general its always been a configure as much as you can to be generalized and then customize that item when you deploy it.... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Been_Done_Before Posted on: 11/10/08 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
It's the natural evolution  dbowler | 11/10/08
Why not use... Grid based computing via VMs  gfolkert | 11/10/08
As with most things.. you cannot fully automate things for every system...  Been_Done_Before | 11/10/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Click Here
advertisement

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here